If it wasn't for marketing nonsense by Square the names would not be so misleading. Only the two new games have relevant story between them (and so much so that Hitman 2 actually contains all of Hitman (2016)'s included as a legacy pack so you can play them inside the same launcher remastered) They are also mostly irrelevant, no old games have had any important story line carry over between them (with the sole exception of contracts into blood money which was because they broke up blood money's original story into 2 games) They are not a reboot, all games are canon Something tells me I should not bother with this one actually since the new titles are reboot? Hard is still kinda challenging but also too easy as well. If Purist and Expert is for those who already played the game then I can just play on Hard. I enjoy them on my first experience and that is why it will be only one run for me and I have to choose the best challenging difficulty. If you still feel a compulsion to replay it, you'll have the understanding you need to push through purist not a fan of replaying missions. If you are finding hard to be easy, just finish on hard so you see the story line and learn the maps. If you liked Blood Money you will probably like the newer games better than Absolution.
I played again on purist just to prove I could, purist was not fun (for me)
There's a few memorable moments but most of it is bleh Honestly my problem with absolution is that it's so linear that I didn't enjoy a lot of it by default, I played through the first time on normal just to get it over with and see the story line. Originally posted by Kunovega:The best difficulty is the one you enjoy.
0 kommentar(er)
